📄 Public Demo Report · Strategy Analysis

Breakout Strategy Performance

28 trades analyzed across stock and futures breakout setups

+$42/trade

Expectancy Per Trade

Demo data — not a real trader's results

Analyze My Strategies → Open Trade Journal

Trades Taken

Win Rate

58%

Net P&L

+$1,176

Profit Factor

1.91

Avg Win

+$168

Avg Loss

-$98

Expectancy

+$42/trade

Strategy Breakdown

Breakout trades were tagged and analyzed separately from pullback, reversal, and continuation setups in the trader's journal.

📊

58% Win Rate on Breakouts

Above the 50% breakeven threshold. The strategy consistently identifies valid breakout setups that follow through.

💰

Average Win 1.71× Average Loss

Winners average $168 vs losers at $98. This R:R combined with 58% win rate produces a robust system.

📈

Best Setup: Volume Breakout Above Resistance

Trades tagged as A+ setups with volume confirmation outperformed by 2.3× compared to B-grade breakout entries.

⚠️

Late Entries Underperforming

6 breakout trades entered more than 2% above the breakout level had a 33% win rate vs 68% for on-time entries.

Best Breakout Instruments

Symbol	Trades	Win Rate	Net P&L	Best Setup
NVDA	8	75%	+$485	AI catalyst breakout
TSLA	7	57%	+$312	Weekly resistance break
AAPL	5	60%	+$228	52-week high breakout
QQQ	4	25%	-$187	ETF breakouts — avoid
META	4	75%	+$338	Earnings gap breakout

What Makes a Valid Breakout?

A breakout is when price moves above a key resistance level or below a key support level, often accompanied by increased volume. High-quality breakouts share these characteristics: volume at least 1.5× average at breakout bar, clean consolidation period before the break, and a catalyst (earnings, news, sector rotation) that justifies the move.

This demo data shows that QQQ ETF breakouts significantly underperformed individual stock breakouts. Sector-specific catalysts appear to be more meaningful than broad market breakouts for this style of trading.

More Demo Reports

→ Expectancy Analysis Report → Risk Per Trade Example Report